Sky sued SkyKick over use of the SkyKick name for email migration and cloud storage services. SkyKick challenged the validity of Sky's trade marks, arguing that some applications were filed too broadly and in bad faith.
Selected cases
UK Supreme Court · [2024] UKSC 36
SkyKick UK Ltd v Sky Ltd
The UK Supreme Court considered bad faith in broad trade mark applications and infringement in a dispute between Sky and SkyKick.
UK Supreme Court13 Nov 2024
Plain-English explainers, not legal advice. Use the linked official source for section-level detail, and get advice for your situation.
Get legal helpStart here
Quick read
- Trade mark applications should match a real commercial plan.
- The UK Supreme Court considered bad faith in broad trade mark applications and infringement in a dispute between Sky and SkyKick.
Use this to check
- File trade marks around real goods and services
- Keep notes of brand expansion plans where filings are broad
- Review old portfolios before enforcing against another business
Decision snapshot
What happened
- Sky sued SkyKick over use of the SkyKick name for email migration and cloud storage services.
- SkyKick challenged the validity of Sky's trade marks, arguing that some applications were filed too broadly and in bad faith.
What the court had to decide
- The Court had to consider when overly broad trade mark specifications can be invalid for bad faith and how that affects infringement.
What the court decided
- The Supreme Court held that parts of Sky's trade marks were invalid for bad faith, while also addressing infringement on the remaining valid scope.
- The judgment is important for brand filing strategy.
Practical impact
Practical read
- Trade mark applications should match a real commercial plan.
- Filing for everything can backfire if the specification has no proper rationale.
- Startups should seek broad enough protection, but not fantasy coverage.
Useful next steps
- File trade marks around real goods and services
- Keep notes of brand expansion plans where filings are broad
- Review old portfolios before enforcing against another business
How businesses should read it
Trade mark applications should match a real commercial plan. Filing for everything can backfire if the specification has no proper rationale. Startups should seek broad enough protection, but not fantasy coverage.
Key takeaways
- File trade marks around real goods and services
- Keep notes of brand expansion plans where filings are broad
- Review old portfolios before enforcing against another business