Selected cases

UK Supreme Court · [2022] UKSC 25

BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA

The UK Supreme Court explained when directors must consider creditors' interests as a company approaches insolvency.

UK Supreme Court5 Oct 2022

Plain-English explainers, not legal advice. Use the linked official source for section-level detail, and get advice for your situation.

Get legal help

Start here

Quick read

  • Directors should change their decision-making discipline as financial distress increases.
  • The UK Supreme Court explained when directors must consider creditors' interests as a company approaches insolvency.

Use this to check

  • Escalate governance when cash flow gets tight
  • Record solvency analysis before dividends or major payments
  • Do not wait for formal insolvency before considering creditor impact

Decision snapshot

  1. What happened

    • AWA paid a substantial dividend to its shareholder, Sequana, while it had long-term contingent liabilities.
    • AWA later became insolvent.
    • BTI, as assignee of claims, argued that AWA's directors had breached a creditor-duty by approving the dividend.
  2. What the court had to decide

    • The Court had to decide whether English law recognises a creditor-duty and when it is triggered.
  3. What the court decided

    • The Supreme Court confirmed that directors can owe a duty to consider creditors' interests when insolvency is imminent or probable, or when insolvent liquidation or administration is probable.
    • On the facts, the duty had not been triggered at the time of the dividend.

Practical impact

Practical read

  • Directors should change their decision-making discipline as financial distress increases.
  • Board papers, cash-flow evidence and creditor impact should become more explicit before dividends, group payments, asset sales or risky trading decisions are approved.

Useful next steps

  • Escalate governance when cash flow gets tight
  • Record solvency analysis before dividends or major payments
  • Do not wait for formal insolvency before considering creditor impact

The story

AWA paid a substantial dividend to its shareholder, Sequana, while it had long-term contingent liabilities. AWA later became insolvent. BTI, as assignee of claims, argued that AWA's directors had breached a creditor-duty by approving the dividend.

How businesses should read it

Directors should change their decision-making discipline as financial distress increases. Board papers, cash-flow evidence and creditor impact should become more explicit before dividends, group payments, asset sales or risky trading decisions are approved.

Key takeaways

  • Escalate governance when cash flow gets tight
  • Record solvency analysis before dividends or major payments
  • Do not wait for formal insolvency before considering creditor impact

Related topics

How Sprintlaw can help