Selected cases

UK Supreme Court · [2018] UKSC 24

Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd

The UK Supreme Court held that no-oral-modification clauses can be legally effective.

UK Supreme Court16 May 2018

Plain-English explainers, not legal advice. Use the linked official source for section-level detail, and get advice for your situation.

Get legal help

Start here

Quick read

  • If a contract says variations must be in writing, do not rely on a casual call or email chain to change the deal.
  • The UK Supreme Court held that no-oral-modification clauses can be legally effective.

Use this to check

  • Use written variation deeds or signed change orders where required
  • Train account managers not to promise informal payment changes
  • Keep contract admin aligned with commercial conversations

Decision snapshot

  1. What happened

    • Rock Advertising licensed office space from MWB.
    • After arrears built up, Rock said the parties had orally agreed a revised payment schedule.
    • MWB argued that the written contract required variations to be in writing and signed.
  2. What the court had to decide

    • The Court had to decide whether a clause requiring written variations prevented an oral variation from taking effect.
  3. What the court decided

    • The Supreme Court held that no-oral-modification clauses are generally effective.
    • Businesses can agree that later changes must be made in a prescribed written form.

Practical impact

Practical read

  • If a contract says variations must be in writing, do not rely on a casual call or email chain to change the deal.
  • Sales, account management and finance teams should know when a formal variation is required.

Useful next steps

  • Use written variation deeds or signed change orders where required
  • Train account managers not to promise informal payment changes
  • Keep contract admin aligned with commercial conversations

The story

Rock Advertising licensed office space from MWB. After arrears built up, Rock said the parties had orally agreed a revised payment schedule. MWB argued that the written contract required variations to be in writing and signed.

How businesses should read it

If a contract says variations must be in writing, do not rely on a casual call or email chain to change the deal. Sales, account management and finance teams should know when a formal variation is required.

Key takeaways

  • Use written variation deeds or signed change orders where required
  • Train account managers not to promise informal payment changes
  • Keep contract admin aligned with commercial conversations

Related topics

How Sprintlaw can help