Selected cases

UK Supreme Court · [2024] UKSC 28

Tesco Stores Ltd v USDAW

The UK Supreme Court considered whether Tesco could terminate and rehire staff to remove a permanent retained-pay entitlement.

UK Supreme Court12 Sept 2024

Plain-English explainers, not legal advice. Use the linked official source for section-level detail, and get advice for your situation.

Get legal help

Start here

Quick read

  • Employers should be careful with promises described as permanent, guaranteed or protected.
  • The UK Supreme Court considered whether Tesco could terminate and rehire staff to remove a permanent retained-pay entitlement.

Use this to check

  • Avoid casual use of permanent language in employment promises
  • Document the commercial basis for pay protection arrangements
  • Get advice before using fire-and-rehire tactics

Decision snapshot

  1. What happened

    • Tesco had agreed retained pay with some employees as part of a relocation arrangement.
    • The entitlement was described as permanent.
    • Years later, Tesco sought to terminate contracts and offer re-engagement without retained pay.
  2. What the court had to decide

    • The issue was whether an implied term prevented Tesco from terminating employment contracts for the purpose of removing the retained-pay entitlement.
  3. What the court decided

    • The Supreme Court restored an injunction preventing Tesco from using termination in that way.
    • The wording and circumstances made the entitlement permanent in a meaningful contractual sense.

Practical impact

Practical read

  • Employers should be careful with promises described as permanent, guaranteed or protected.
  • Cost pressure later may not justify undoing a carefully negotiated entitlement by termination and rehire.

Useful next steps

  • Avoid casual use of permanent language in employment promises
  • Document the commercial basis for pay protection arrangements
  • Get advice before using fire-and-rehire tactics

The story

Tesco had agreed retained pay with some employees as part of a relocation arrangement. The entitlement was described as permanent. Years later, Tesco sought to terminate contracts and offer re-engagement without retained pay.

How businesses should read it

Employers should be careful with promises described as permanent, guaranteed or protected. Cost pressure later may not justify undoing a carefully negotiated entitlement by termination and rehire.

Key takeaways

  • Avoid casual use of permanent language in employment promises
  • Document the commercial basis for pay protection arrangements
  • Get advice before using fire-and-rehire tactics

Related topics

How Sprintlaw can help